Talk:Mighty Claw/@comment-82.41.28.14-20190819221228

I'm sorry, but how are you sure that Sjin is just as bad as Caff? Have you read all of the evidence that Lewis has seen? Do you know the full extent of his actions? I'm not saying that Sjin is a harmless saint and the second coming of Jesus himself, I AM aware that he's clearly done some very shady things behind closed doors, but if you do not have clear proof (from the mix of fake and TRUE photos, which, as Lewis stated, can be very hard to discern from) that Sjin is on the same level of the guy who's been proved to be holding his power over people for... you know what - by 8 moderators - wouldn't it be better to not just make untrue statements?

Think of it like this: you're back in high school the place where gossip and drama thrives, back in the 1990s (or whenever homophobia was extremely common) . There's this person of the same gender to you that you're attracted to, and one day you finally pick up the courage to ask them out. Then it all goes downhill: you're rejected, humiliated in front of their friends, and outed to the whole school. Then rumours start to circulate etc. etc. Apparently you're a pervert now and people start avoiding you. All in all, it's pretty shite. How would you feel?

sorry i just got bored and thought it'd help with my crappy way of expressing a point.

I'm not saying Sjin's actions are as innocent as this, but you get the gist of it right? Stuff gets blown up way out of proportion and people are ruined (remember Tobuscus?) because of (many) people wanting to embellish on the stories and not bothering to check the original source (and maybe my post will too), because of people believing the VERY FIRST thing they hear, like sheep. And it seems that you're not helping with this either. Why not? Isn't this frustrating?

If you keep making assumptive and explosive statements without owning up to it, you would be damaging your credibility. On reddit, for example, someone has already commented on your attitude. Simply a suggestion, but I think adapting to more impartial and calm responses (such as reviewing the facts available, not jumping onto bandwagons and conclusions) would greatly improve your credibilty on things like this. Thanks.