Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-31035787-20130117223307/@comment-24403485-20130122233408

Soldier Elite wrote: Ah, okay. Let me explain. Before there was a Bureaucrat that tried to take over the wiki. He took away the rights of every Admin, including me. blablabla *insert a whole load of bollox here*

IT WAS PEVA.

HE HAD A REASON FOR IT.

DO NOT TREAT HIM LIKE EVERYONE ELSE, FFS HE CREATED THIS WIKI.

I'm not saying what he did was good, by any means. But he didn't become bureaucrat like you, S.E., he created this wiki and that made him one. Nobody said that made him the most trustworthy person in the universe and beyond. Anyone who gets bureaucrat the regular way, gets it because he's trustworthy in the first place.

NinjaFatGuy wrote: Do you need to make a limit for ALL users? Like I said, I think there should be no limits for staff. Only give bureaucrat rights to users that been on the wiki for several months, if not over a year, who have made a great contributions and constructive edits, users who can be trusted with powers, such as giving them rollbacks first, then admin, then see where they go with that first. There can be many great users at this wiki who will eventually make a great rollbacker, ect., but if there is a full limit on the rights group, they won't get a chance to be a rollback when we all know they deserve it. I disagree with this topic, and should only give powers to trusted users over a long-time period.

Thanks pal, you expressed just what I feel. Elite, but seriously. Peva vas a separate case. Just forget about him for a moment and think about what Ninja said.