Thread:Aranho/@comment-27177694-20160913195509/@comment-41561-20160915073534

Eh, telling you what to do? Sounds weird since you're an admin. :P

A1) I was thinking of the article to have information of both as a company and as a list of its NPCs. I'm guessing Infobox:Company works just fine, but should Infobox:Character be added too? Infobox company works best I think. We never have more than 1 infobox per page.

A2) Category wise, is it alright to tag it as both Category:Companies and Category:Characters? Yes, once it matches those categories it is fine

A3) As I couldn't find a recommended format for company/organisation, would the sections on the sandbox be alright? Are there sections that could be added/removed? I will check this again, but i imagine it should be similar to like Sipsco or Honeydew Inc Alright cool. I'll refer to those articles on the formatting. Btw, Adrick and Korak have two Infobox:Character boxes. Should they be merged instead?

B1) Perhaps some of the NPCs may have its own article, given its extensive information. Barris, ... Yeah, maybe one page for all the "Recurring NPCs" would keep those together. Barris may find his way to his own page at somestage but only if there's enough content. Adding on to your idea, perhaps we could have the following:
 * High Rollers D&D/NPCs (Recurring or Major Roles) <-- Used as main NPC article (i.e. rename the current one*)
 * High Rollers D&D/NPCs (One Time or Minor Roles)
 * High Rollers D&D/NPCs (Association or Group) <-- Used for NPCs with similar association or group (e.g. Bucklands, Deities, Group of Four Drows, etc.)

 * Or the current NPC article can be used as an disambiguation page, since I've realised that lots of articles link to that page.

B2) Alternatively, maybe the NPCs article can split into alphabets, split according to sessions, or split according to campaigns/seasons... The once off campaign NPCs are awkward since they aren't in the main story, so keep them to their respective summary pages. Splitting the remaining NPCs as you have done on the NPC page is fine for now Agreed. I'll take note of this and remove the one-off NPCs from the main article.

C1) I've added sub-sections and "X Round of Battle" ... for the purpose to make the long summaries easier to read and also link to these sub-sections ... Could this actually work against the article, since it add hundreds of bytes into the long pages already? I like these, good idea to make content easier to read. I know the pages are long but they work for the summaries, I have heard many people say they appreciate the level of detail so I wouldn't like to compromise that. Ah nice! I'll keep in mind of what the people have said. Also, are the titles for the sub-sections alright (e.g. The Republic Strikes Back)? :P

C2) Perhaps certain events can be moved to its own article ... and mentioned briefly in the summary... Could probably be cut down a little to remove the excess info yeah, as long as the summary remains coherent it is fine, and the word "Bresseras" links to its page people can find info Alright cool, I'll take note of this. Btw, I have an off-topic idea but it may sound excessive: could we have a "High Rollers D&D/Races"? It not only list the races and homwbrewed races mentioned in HR, but also how they play out in the story that is not present in the original D&D lore (e.g. lightborn, relationship between dragonborns & tieflings).

C3) I remember a conversation a while back where the admins may have plans to cut down the long pages. May I know if there are any plans on that so far? Hasn't been discussed really, but then again only applies to the High Rollers pages. I suspect the wiki Bureaucrats would alert me if there was a need to shorten them Ah alright.