Thread:Aranho/@comment-27177694-20160913195509/@comment-27177694-20160914221645

You even have more edits than me now, you can tell me what to do! XD but I answer question below :P 1) I was thinking of the article to have information of both as a company and as a list of its NPCs. I'm guessing Infobox:Company works just fine, but should Infobox:Character be added too? Infobox company works best I think. We never have more than 1 infobox per page. 2) Category wise, is it alright to tag it as both Category:Companies and Category:Characters? Yes, once it matches those categories it is fine 3) As I couldn't find a recommended format for company/organisation, would the sections on the sandbox be alright? Are there sections that could be added/removed? I will check this again, but i imagine it should be similar to like Sipsco or Honeydew Inc

1) Perhaps some of the NPCs may have its own article, given its extensive information. Barris, Council of Guilds (may include how the Council works too), Group of Four Drows (got a better name for it? I ain't sure if this could work as a title for an article). Perhaps also Lao-Lee-Sheng, Dark Scar Clan, Torwen (may be written as guest character?), Vixanis/Xandar (as House of Kel), Wald (merge with Cam?). Yeah, maybe one page for all the "Recurring NPCs" would keep those together. Barris may find his way to his own page at somestage but only if there's enough content. 2) Alternatively, maybe the NPCs article can split into alphabets (A-M, N-Z), split according to sessions (1-10, 11-20, 21-???), or split according to campaigns/seasons (Lightfall, One-off, etc) for the possibility of more High Rollers seasons. '''The once off campaign NPCs are awkward since they aren't in the main story, so keep them to their respective summary pages. Splitting the remaining NPCs as you have done on the NPC page is fine for now'''

1) I've added sub-sections and "X Round of Battle" to the campaign logs from Sessions 1-7 and some newer sessions so far, for the purpose to make the long summaries easier to read and also link to these sub-sections if mentioned in articles or future Sessions. Could this actually work against the article, since it add hundreds of bytes into the long pages already? I like these, good idea to make content easier to read. I know the pages are long but they work for the summaries, I have heard many people say they appreciate the level of detail so I wouldn't like to compromise that. 2) Perhaps certain events can be moved to its own article (e.g. History of Bresseras in Session 15 be moved to Bresseras article) and mentioned briefly in the summary, especially events that may be mentioned over and over again (e.g. Pelor's Light). Could probably be cut down a little to remove the excess info yeah, as long as the summary remains coherent it is fine, and the word "Bresseras" links to its page people can find info 3) I remember a conversation a while back where the admins may have plans to cut down the long pages. May I know if there are any plans on that so far? Hasn't been discussed really, but then again only applies to the High Rollers pages. I suspect the wiki Bureaucrats would alert me if there was a need to shorten them